This site uses cookies.
Some of these cookies are essential to the operation of the site,
while others help to improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.
For more information, please see the ProZ.com privacy policy.
VIA AILooking for an interpreter?
Remoto by ProZ.com connects you with an identity-verified interpreter by video or phone in about 60 seconds — 300+ languages, on demand or booked ahead.
Try Remoto »
This forum topic is for the discussion of the poll question "How often are you asked to review/correct content produced by humans/AI compared to 2 years ago?".
Even though I have been asked to provide such services in the past, my customers know know that I am not providing such services at all. Just like Iam not interested in MTPE.
Alison M
Subject:
Comment:
The contents of this post will automatically be included in the ticket generated. Please add any additional comments or explanation (optional)
All post-editing offers I receive are machine translation-based. Which seems normal, because in my experience neural machine translation (or at least DeepL) is better/more useful than AI. Perhaps this is more a question for people working with direct customers?
Subject:
Comment:
The contents of this post will automatically be included in the ticket generated. Please add any additional comments or explanation (optional)
For decades some of my work has been editing content produced by other translators and recently I was asked to edit every month content translated with Deepl (paid by the hour).
P.S. I don’t understand why the question says 'content produced by humans/AI' as if they were the same thing or even synonyms…
Philip Lees
Peter Simon
Daryo
Subject:
Comment:
The contents of this post will automatically be included in the ticket generated. Please add any additional comments or explanation (optional)
I don't work with translation agencies. My clients are direct.
Academic university/research clients sometimes ask me to translate their papers prior to submission for publication, and sometimes they draft/translate the articles themselves, no doubt using MT or, nowadays, AI to help them. Some authors are better writers than others, but I'm not noticing any uptick in obvious AI or MT use...
Philip Lees
Subject:
Comment:
The contents of this post will automatically be included in the ticket generated. Please add any additional comments or explanation (optional)
I’ve noticed that beyond the actual translation or revision, a significant part of the work now involves handling text across different tools, especially as current CAT workflows don’t always align well with newer AI-based processes.
It’s not necessarily complex, but it’s highly repetitive, tends to break focus and can even lead to physical fatigue over time.
I’ve been trying to simplify that part of my workflow recently, just to reduce friction in daily work.
Subject:
Comment:
The contents of this post will automatically be included in the ticket generated. Please add any additional comments or explanation (optional)
The leading translation software used by over 270,000 translators.
Designed with your feedback in mind, Trados Studio 2022 delivers an unrivalled, powerful desktop
and cloud solution, empowering you to work in the most efficient and cost-effective way.
Exclusive discount for ProZ.com users!
Save over 13% when purchasing Wordfast Pro through ProZ.com. Wordfast is the world's #1 provider of platform-independent Translation Memory software. Consistently ranked the most user-friendly and highest value